Inbox performance is sub-par (plus load-more is by date range, not count) #774

New issue

Closed

opened 2024-06-08 12:43:23 +12:00 by mikedilger · 1 comment

mikedilger commented

2024-06-08 12:43:23 +12:00

(Migrated from github.com)

We are indexing tags in a separate index, and it is not used to filter events in find_events_by_filter but instead from find_tagged_events which means we don't get ordering and we don't get to include other filters. If we could update storage to work more like pocket-db we could make this one interface and faster.

Also, if we do that, load more by 'count' would suddenly be accessible and usable by inbox too.

We are indexing tags in a separate index, and it is not used to filter events in `find_events_by_filter` but instead from `find_tagged_events` which means we don't get ordering and we don't get to include other filters. If we could update storage to work more like pocket-db we could make this one interface and faster. Also, if we do that, load more by 'count' would suddenly be accessible and usable by inbox too.

mikedilger commented

2024-06-15 11:09:33 +12:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Load more on inbox is now by count, and uses the find_events_by_filter() which has been improved to filter by tags while maintaining a proper limit.