Pending: presumes local copy is correct #714
Labels
No labels
Blocked
Bug
Documentation
Duplicate
Enhancement
Good first issue
Help wanted
Idea
In progress
Invalid
Major feature set
Packaging
Question
Soon
UI/UX
Upstream
You're dreamin'
wontfix
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
nostr/gossip#714
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
When lists are out of sync, oftentimes the remote copy is newest. So "Publish Now" and other language about publishing is not correct. We need to let them manage it on the list page which shows dates and counts so they can think about which one is correct.
So you are saying these covered 3 cases are not correct? We offer "Publish Now" buttons for the first two and a "Manage" button for the last one.
That middle one should also be a Manage button. Because sure it has been 90 days since I ran my client on windows, but during those 90 days the nostr relay events were updated many times. So the right solution is for me to pull in the current lists, not to clobber them with my local old lists.
NotPublishedRecently is probably a bad term. Might be we should rename it.
Hang on, maybe my code is what is wrong. Maybe I should be handing you a case-3 situation and I'm wrongly handing you a case-2 situation.
Fixed on unstable.